The Impact Storytelling Collective opens 9 November. Founding members join free.
Leadership
Social impact storytelling in 2026. Where to invest your time and money
Seven shifts in social impact storytelling for 2026, and what each means for leaders deciding where to spend limited time and money. Grounded in what I'm seeing.
Trend lists are easy to write and hard to use. This one is built for leaders with limited time and budget who need to decide where storytelling effort will pay off this year.
These are the shifts I'm seeing in my own work with charities, funders and CSR teams, and in what my newsletter readers tell me. They're my view, not a forecast.
The backdrop
Money is tight. In 2024/25, 151 charities with an income over £50,000 closed, up from 87 the year before, according to an analysis of Charity Commission data by the accountants Lubbock Fine. CAF's UK Giving Report found that 50% of people donated in 2024, down from 58% in 2019.
When I asked just over 300 readers of my newsletter what they're stuck on, funding came up more than anything else. Everything below is about making storytelling earn its keep.
1. Honest stories over neat endings
Funders read a lot of case studies that end in transformation while the problem keeps growing. The stories that stand out now say where things really stand: what worked, what didn't and what happens next.
Where to invest: rewrite your strongest case studies with an honest "what's still true" line. More on that here.
2. Ethics as a mark of quality
When a large UK funder recently asked its grant holders what support they needed, ethical storytelling came up again and again: consent, dignity, anonymity and safeguarding. Funders and partners are paying attention to how stories are gathered, not only how they read.
Where to invest: bring your consent process up to at least a basic dignity standard. The Consent Protection Spectrum shows where you stand.
3. Protected stories in a more hostile climate
For many communities, being identified carries more risk than it did a few years ago. In 2026, the charity I lead began asking even supportive parents not to reveal their identity publicly unless it was completely safe. Organisations need ways to tell powerful stories without naming anyone.
Where to invest: agree how your organisation tells stories when people can't be identified. Here's how.
4. Data and story, together
The same funder's grant holders asked for help with confidence in data as well as storytelling. The organisations that win support put a person inside their numbers, rather than keeping case studies and outcome tables in separate sections.
Where to invest: choose three numbers for your next report and give each one a person. The One Number Method shows how.
5. AI as an editor, never an author
AI tools are now part of how many teams write. Used well, they help structure drafts, find the strongest number or check a story for false endings. Used badly, they invent people, quotes and experiences. That's the fastest way to lose a funder's trust.
Where to invest: a short written policy: AI can help edit, it must never invent people, quotes or outcomes, and every story is checked by someone who knows the people in it.
6. Capture across the whole team
The best stories happen on the frontline, and most are lost within days. Organisations that build a two-minute capture habit across the team have a steady supply. Those that rely on the comms team hunting for case studies before a deadline don't.
Where to invest: one shared place for story leads, and a weekly review. A simple system is here.
7. Real pictures over polished ones
I learned to photograph by studying Henri Cartier-Bresson, and later worked as Group Web Director at Magnum Photos, the agency he co-founded. The pictures that last are the true ones. Audiences have seen too many staged group shots and stock images to trust them.
Where to invest: fewer, better photographs of the real work, with consent planned in from the start. Documentary photography explained.
What I'd do with a small budget
If you can only do three things this year:
Fix your consent process.
Set up a two-minute story capture habit.
Rebuild your next impact report around three numbers, each with a person inside it.
Ask for: a one-page storytelling plan for the year that names which of these shifts you'll invest in, and which you won't.
Six questions for your leadership team
Which of our stories would a funder trust most, and why?
How good is our consent process, honestly?
Can we tell a powerful story without naming anyone?
Do our numbers have people inside them?
What's our rule on AI?
Where do our frontline stories go?
Questions people ask
What are the biggest trends in social impact storytelling for 2026?
In my view: honest stories over neat endings, ethics as a mark of quality, protected stories in a more hostile climate, data and story together, AI used as an editor rather than an author, story capture across the whole team, and real pictures over polished ones.
Where should a small charity start?
With consent, a simple story capture habit, and one report built around a few numbers with real people inside them.
Should charities use AI for storytelling?
For editing and structure, carefully. Never to invent people, quotes or outcomes.
If you'd like help deciding where to focus your storytelling this year, that's part of my storytelling consultancy.
Matt Mahmood-Ogston is a London-based social impact storyteller and documentary photographer. He founded the Naz and Matt Foundation in 2014 and has led it for more than 12 years.
